Middle Powers: Passive or Active Stakeholders?

SYMPOSIUM


“Middle powers: Passive or active stakeholders?”


 
April 27, 2017
Université catholique de Louvain
Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

 
 

The question of the purpose, or raison d’être, of the concept of middle power leads to a lot of debates. Is it a catch-all concept? Culturally bounded? All-en- compassing? Some have even proposed to abandon the concept. Others think that the concept needs to be analysed more profoundly and that new analytical tools should be deployed to gain a better understanding of what it includes.
Genesys Network and the Center for the Study of Crises and International Conflicts (CECRI) hosted a symposium on “Middle powers: Passive or Active Stakeholders ?”, bringing together scholars and practitioners to exchange views on middle powers and their role in the 21st century.

 
 

 
 

Find below photos from the day.

 
 

Link to the call for papers

Call for papers PDF


Latest Publications


 David Walton and Emilian Kavalski (eds.), Power Transition in Asia, Routledge, 2017.
 
 

Christopher Ogden, New South Asian Security: Six Core Relations Underpinning Regional Security, Orient Black Swan, 2016.

 

M.-A. Éthier et Éric Mottet (dir.), , Didactiques de l’histoire, de la géographie et de l’éducation à la citoyenneté : recherches et pratiques, De Boeck supérieur, 2016.

 

Tanguy Struye de Swielande and Dorothée Vandamme (eds.), , Power in the 21st Century: Determinants and Contours, Presses universitaires de Louvain, 2015.